The freedom of speech for whom?

For example, I’ve learned well in last three days, freedom of speech is not for me. This is not related with that I’m not from this planet:) Because, if it is, you know that all mankind same reacts to the extraterrestrials more or less without differences in west or east on the planet Earth. But last three months I am realized increasingly, especially last three days, I don’t have any freedom of speech for talking about Charlie Hebdo massacre at imperialist western internet web pages.

I am following the events in three days, as same as the people. Unfortunately, I saw that the east and the west are divided sharply from each other again. The different sounds are rising on two sides. Last three days I’ve been trying to ask the questions, which are in most eastern people’s mind. But I couldn’t. They didn’t let me. Who didn’t let me?: well-known freedom of speech defenders of western media and blog pages.

Charlie Hebdo massacre is a terrible event, which has happened over the humorists and the free thoughts. The people who were killed have been selected as the victim literally. Most discreet people are aware of it. But unfortunately the number of people, who are discreet and have impartial perspective, is very few. Tragedies are the events, what can be easily manipulated on Earth history. The facts behind this tragedy and the fact that it provides benefits to whom, come out much later in generally. But in this case, there is the fact that the imperialism prepared it already for a long time. This fact is obvious. If this fact is ignored, East-West differentiation, as I said at the beginning will get sharp.

And, their questions that I wanted to ask, but I couldn’t ask are as follow with quotes.

Why the Western world did not rise for 132 children who died in Peshawar school massacre by Taliban in Pakistan at December 17, 2014? Was there any possibility in the western world eyes that maybe some of those children would have been best caricaturists of world at the future?

Why didn’t the western world react for 48 people, who killed in May 2014 in Odessa massacre in Ukraine? They were killed for their support of Russia. Is it for that Europe did not give response? Is it for that the extreme rightist Ukrainians, who prevented to firemen, who want to rescue the people inside the building, were held in high esteem by Europe?

George Orwell said that “Every human life is valuable, but the lives of some are more valuable.” In present-day conditions, are human lives changing according to democratic values from country to country?

*I guess, this original quotes “All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others” from Animal Farm. It should be adapted to the situation.

In 2010, Moscow Subway bombings, 40 people are died. At those days, Europe was laughing to the caricatures, which were made about this tragedy. Any caricaturist or people in Europe didn’t react potently to them. Why?

So, you throw the boomerang and it comes back to hit you square in the face. You spend months demonizing “Assad”, saying “he must go”, then what happens? Thousands of youths with empty lives jet off to Syria to become Jihadis, many of them thinking they are doing their duty for their religion (although because President Assad is a Moslem therefore any act against him is unjustified) and their country. And now what? Many of these Jihadis are totally demoralized because they see the Syrian “Opposition” for what it is, namely a bunch of thugs and terrorists impaling kids on metal spikes, slicing the breasts off women in the streets, decapitating them then raping the bodies, using Downs Syndrome children as suicide bombers and so on.

In April 2014, 25 children, in October 2014, 12 children were killed at school with bombing in Syria. And these are not big events for the Europe. In any case, almost every days Syrians are killing with bombing. Don’t Europeans find strange because of thinking that it is easy to die in Middle East? France was the initiator of UN Security Council resolution that gave permission for the invasion of Syria. In particular, is that for reason of this, France doesn’t see the dying children in Syria?

The questions with historical contents go further past, after a certain point.

Why French Government doesn’t take own responsibility to the tragedies, which have lived Burkina Faso and Algeria. When France made massacre, its name is not the massacre? The French would have given a worthless diploma to the Eastern students, which took education at French university in 19th century to emphasize that the second-class education is given to those students. “bon pour l’orient”, which was mean “enough for the orient” was written over this diploma. Or is France still thinking that “enough for the orient” in this age?

For example, Sarkozy had said “I will not apologize for Algeria.” Sarkozy was the president of the country, which has got a village which is name “Mort Aux Juifs”, that means “Death to the Jews”. This village still has the same name. He was the president of a country, who agreed to Armenian genocide with the decisions of politicians without asking historians. If anyone says that there is no Armenian genocide, in France, is imprisoned. On which justification? In accordance with the political decisions taken by politicians; not on scientific facts. France is trying to leave a nation alone with genocide, without feeling the need to look to the Ottoman archives, the Russian archives, Germany archives, even Deutsche Bank archives. Which is, somehow Armenia doesn’t open own state archives already.

And questions, questions…

As result the people ask; For whom the freedom of speech? I am asking too, for whom. It was registered last three days, not for me:) And there is a more important point: Differences in approach of the people.

Example, I can ask those questions any web pages, which are belonging to the Russians and Turks, which are living under the becoming to the police-state almost thoroughly.

In any web pages of Russia, I can ask:
Ukrainian holocaust-holodomor is being claimed that was made in Stalin era. Is it true? The hunger of those times in Ukraine makes no sense for me. What is the historical knowledge about this?
So far, I don’t have experiences to be affronted by the other members in every website that I asked. Or they didn’t prevent my questions.
Or in any web pages of Turkey, I can ask:
“Kurds are the citizens of your country, aren’t they? Why they want to rebel? Or, as alleged Armenian genocide, is it correct? What are your historical references as a scientific?
And in the same way, so far, I don’t have experiences to be affronted by the other members in every website that I asked. Or they didn’t prevent my questions.

I didn’t ask the above questions to the web pages or blogs, which are the individuals belonging to other countries. Only I had asked Ukrainian Holocaust at one blog, which I thought that blog’s owner, is from Ukraine. But, this blog has prevented to my comments after my two comments. I am thinking that the blog writes, who I made comment on their blog pages, know me more or less. I never made a comment, which was insult and provocation. But for some reason, people do not want to hear the logical and scientific questions. Well, where is the freedom of speech? To prevent the questions, brings more questions along with? Such as “why is prevented? or ” Is there something to want hiding?”

I’m trying to understand. I want to understand. You appreciate that my work is more harder because I’m not from planet Earth:) As long as similar questions about freedom of speech are increasing and answers never taking, Europe will be lonely. However, I believe the people, who are approaching to the events in a discreet and scientific way. Let’s hope that their presences increase more. Otherwise, after 2017, nothing will be the same on this planet.

Quotes from:
http://pikabu.ru/story/pro_charlie_hebdo_karikaturyi_i_litsemerie_2972993
http://www.echo.msk.ru/news/
http://ursa-tm.ru/forum/index.php?/topic/121866-«сегодня-мы-все-шарли-эбдо»/
http://mignews.com/news/disasters/world/
http://odivizion.ru/litsemerie-zapada/
http://english.pravda.ru/opinion/columnists/08-01-2015/129481-hebdo_hypocrisy-0/
http://sozcu.com.tr/2014/yazarlar/soner-yalcin/bon-pour-lorient-679242/

Advertisements

One thought on “The freedom of speech for whom?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s